<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Aftermath</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/</link>
	<description>Strategic Business Blogging &#38; Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:08:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 15 Link Building Methods, Get The Most Out Of Each Of Them &#124; Xemhay.com</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-32763</link>
		<dc:creator>15 Link Building Methods, Get The Most Out Of Each Of Them &#124; Xemhay.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-32763</guid>
		<description>[...] it the Nate Whitehill way. One custom theme for John Chow and one redesign for Shoemoney got him $13,000 worth of orders. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it the Nate Whitehill way. One custom theme for John Chow and one redesign for Shoemoney got him $13,000 worth of orders. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bulletproof Link Building Methods &#171; Search Engine Optimization Geeks</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-32740</link>
		<dc:creator>Bulletproof Link Building Methods &#171; Search Engine Optimization Geeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-32740</guid>
		<description>[...] it the Nate Whitehill way. One custom theme for John Chow and one redesign for Shoemoney got him $13,000 worth of orders. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it the Nate Whitehill way. One custom theme for John Chow and one redesign for Shoemoney got him $13,000 worth of orders. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 15 Link Building Methods, Get The Most Out Of Each Of Them &#124; Xemhay Webblog</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-32728</link>
		<dc:creator>15 Link Building Methods, Get The Most Out Of Each Of Them &#124; Xemhay Webblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-32728</guid>
		<description>[...] it the Nate Whitehill way. One custom theme for John Chow and one redesign for Shoemoney got him $13,000 worth of orders. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it the Nate Whitehill way. One custom theme for John Chow and one redesign for Shoemoney got him $13,000 worth of orders. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 15 Link Building Methods, Get The Most Out Of Each Of Them &#171; Xemhay</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-32720</link>
		<dc:creator>15 Link Building Methods, Get The Most Out Of Each Of Them &#171; Xemhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-32720</guid>
		<description>[...] it the Nate Whitehill way. One custom theme for John Chow and one redesign for Shoemoney got him $13,000 worth of orders. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it the Nate Whitehill way. One custom theme for John Chow and one redesign for Shoemoney got him $13,000 worth of orders. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 15 Link Building Methods, Get The Most Out Of Each Of Them</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-12672</link>
		<dc:creator>15 Link Building Methods, Get The Most Out Of Each Of Them</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-12672</guid>
		<description>[...] it the Nate Whitehill way. One custom theme for John Chow and one redesign for Shoemoney got him $13,000 worth of orders. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it the Nate Whitehill way. One custom theme for John Chow and one redesign for Shoemoney got him $13,000 worth of orders. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dojo</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10711</link>
		<dc:creator>dojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10711</guid>
		<description>I did find the theme to be a bit similar in some elements with this one, a good thing. I am also thinking about a serious re-design and I liked the way you organize the content in the design. The new design for chow is very nice. Very blog-like, clean and pleasant. Excellent job ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did find the theme to be a bit similar in some elements with this one, a good thing. I am also thinking about a serious re-design and I liked the way you organize the content in the design. The new design for chow is very nice. Very blog-like, clean and pleasant. Excellent job <img src='http://natewhitehill.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Out (25/8/07) &#124; Success in the Digital Life :: New!</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10683</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Out (25/8/07) &#124; Success in the Digital Life :: New!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10683</guid>
		<description>[...] Nate Whitehill – The Aftermath Nate talks about his recent blog design for John Chow. Theres a few interesting tidbits on blog design in there. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nate Whitehill – The Aftermath Nate talks about his recent blog design for John Chow. Theres a few interesting tidbits on blog design in there. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deron Sizemore</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10654</link>
		<dc:creator>Deron Sizemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10654</guid>
		<description>I think design widths are definitely shifting wider (&#039;bout time right?). I&#039;m designing all of my sites that are fixed with for 1024x768 and haven&#039;t really thought twice about 800x600 to be honest. It&#039;s way past time to still be using 800x600. It&#039;s just so much easier to design a visually appealing yet functional design at 1024. 800 everything is so cramped unless you&#039;re using 8px font.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think design widths are definitely shifting wider (&#8217;bout time right?). I&#8217;m designing all of my sites that are fixed with for 1024&#215;768 and haven&#8217;t really thought twice about 800&#215;600 to be honest. It&#8217;s way past time to still be using 800&#215;600. It&#8217;s just so much easier to design a visually appealing yet functional design at 1024. 800 everything is so cramped unless you&#8217;re using 8px font.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webolution: Blogging is Changing. Forever. - Zoomstart</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10652</link>
		<dc:creator>Webolution: Blogging is Changing. Forever. - Zoomstart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10652</guid>
		<description>[...] been changing. Copyblogger&#8217;s new design by Chris Pearson and John Chow&#8217;s new theme by Nate Whitehill are packing more punch into every page than ever [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been changing. Copyblogger&#8217;s new design by Chris Pearson and John Chow&#8217;s new theme by Nate Whitehill are packing more punch into every page than ever [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10576</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10576</guid>
		<description>I think you went about this the right way Nate. Theres not many design companies which launch with the design of such a popular site. Hopefully you&#039;ll get some good business from this :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you went about this the right way Nate. Theres not many design companies which launch with the design of such a popular site. Hopefully you&#8217;ll get some good business from this <img src='http://natewhitehill.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debo Hobo</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10454</link>
		<dc:creator>Debo Hobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10454</guid>
		<description>I like the wider layout, the current popular templates are like planting a sinlge tulip in the middle of a field and calling it a garden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the wider layout, the current popular templates are like planting a sinlge tulip in the middle of a field and calling it a garden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingJacob</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10402</link>
		<dc:creator>KingJacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10402</guid>
		<description>You can argue its the site designers responsibilty to make their site usable to all users but there is a limit.  If you are still using 800x600 thats your problem, its not a huge investment to get a 1024x768 monitor, since thats the bottom standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can argue its the site designers responsibilty to make their site usable to all users but there is a limit.  If you are still using 800&#215;600 thats your problem, its not a huge investment to get a 1024&#215;768 monitor, since thats the bottom standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingJacob</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10385</link>
		<dc:creator>KingJacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10385</guid>
		<description>If you want to read a blog without looking at ads why dont you just subscribe to the blogs feed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to read a blog without looking at ads why dont you just subscribe to the blogs feed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10379</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10379</guid>
		<description>You did good Nate.

All one has to do to figure out the screen size issue, is check their stats. If John Chow was getting mostly visitors with 800x600 resolution, he and Nate wouldn&#039;t have gone wider!

I remember this same scariness against resolution changes back when we broke from 640x480...who wants to read something that&#039;s only 500px wide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did good Nate.</p>
<p>All one has to do to figure out the screen size issue, is check their stats. If John Chow was getting mostly visitors with 800&#215;600 resolution, he and Nate wouldn&#8217;t have gone wider!</p>
<p>I remember this same scariness against resolution changes back when we broke from 640&#215;480&#8230;who wants to read something that&#8217;s only 500px wide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee Barizo</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10362</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee Barizo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10362</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link back.  I like your blog design style.  And thanks for keeping the price low.  Hopefully, when I have money for a new blog design, your prices won&#039;t be much higher :) Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link back.  I like your blog design style.  And thanks for keeping the price low.  Hopefully, when I have money for a new blog design, your prices won&#8217;t be much higher <img src='http://natewhitehill.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10348</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10348</guid>
		<description>I do like the new design, but if I can offer you some advice is that you need to be careful with your new venture.

You have a certain style for designing blogs, and the similarities between your blog and John Chow&#039;s blog design are noticable (my first thought with the new design was &quot;Ooh, it looks like Nate&quot;).

As a web designer myself, the hardest thing to do is bash out designs that don&#039;t look the same, yet are still useable. We have lost clients early on because our designs looked similar to other websites. I would recommend that you spend time trying new ideas to make designs that work, yet are different.

Best of luck with your new venture!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like the new design, but if I can offer you some advice is that you need to be careful with your new venture.</p>
<p>You have a certain style for designing blogs, and the similarities between your blog and John Chow&#8217;s blog design are noticable (my first thought with the new design was &#8220;Ooh, it looks like Nate&#8221;).</p>
<p>As a web designer myself, the hardest thing to do is bash out designs that don&#8217;t look the same, yet are still useable. We have lost clients early on because our designs looked similar to other websites. I would recommend that you spend time trying new ideas to make designs that work, yet are different.</p>
<p>Best of luck with your new venture!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ukrainian</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10329</link>
		<dc:creator>Ukrainian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10329</guid>
		<description>I think disigners of blogs have to make their designs for any resolutions, including 1024x768, or even 800x600. Maybe it is better to do it using redirect, or developing special plugin for a blog engine, thar will show another version of blog design for users with low resolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think disigners of blogs have to make their designs for any resolutions, including 1024&#215;768, or even 800&#215;600. Maybe it is better to do it using redirect, or developing special plugin for a blog engine, thar will show another version of blog design for users with low resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Culpepper</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10307</link>
		<dc:creator>David Culpepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10307</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve avoided commenting on John&#039;s new design but since you brought it up... :)

I prefer the wider look so it&#039;s not the width that I don&#039;t like.  It&#039;s the header and that&#039;s because I see two totally different things when I look at your header and John&#039;s header.  With your header here, it is clean, organized and pleasing to the eye.  I love it.  John&#039;s is too cluttered and busy... there&#039;s way too much going on for my tastes.

I also like the bigger footers and think you did a fantastic job with John&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve avoided commenting on John&#8217;s new design but since you brought it up&#8230; <img src='http://natewhitehill.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I prefer the wider look so it&#8217;s not the width that I don&#8217;t like.  It&#8217;s the header and that&#8217;s because I see two totally different things when I look at your header and John&#8217;s header.  With your header here, it is clean, organized and pleasing to the eye.  I love it.  John&#8217;s is too cluttered and busy&#8230; there&#8217;s way too much going on for my tastes.</p>
<p>I also like the bigger footers and think you did a fantastic job with John&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Klinkert</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10300</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Klinkert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10300</guid>
		<description>Nate,
I like the new design a lot and really like your and Josh&#039;s blog designs too,

good Job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate,<br />
I like the new design a lot and really like your and Josh&#8217;s blog designs too,</p>
<p>good Job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10296</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10296</guid>
		<description>I think the new theme is much better. I run Firefox and I noticed lots of small display bugs on his old theme that wouldn&#039;t load correctly for some reason (probably just my system).  Also I  agree with points you made about moving things to header and I think it just looks better. It&#039;s a more modern look for blogs that have become more than blogs. Tech Crunch also has this new style and I think it&#039;s an improvement for Problogger as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the new theme is much better. I run Firefox and I noticed lots of small display bugs on his old theme that wouldn&#8217;t load correctly for some reason (probably just my system).  Also I  agree with points you made about moving things to header and I think it just looks better. It&#8217;s a more modern look for blogs that have become more than blogs. Tech Crunch also has this new style and I think it&#8217;s an improvement for Problogger as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krillz</title>
		<link>http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-10295</link>
		<dc:creator>krillz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/the-aftermath/#comment-10295</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that they become bigger because of the need to cram more content, on john chows blog now all I see is a lot of ads, which takes away the focus of the content which is the main thing regarding the blog, the content/posts is the whole point of a blog, wider solutions are for regular sites.
I feel that it&#039;s more blog heading towards regular site layout than blogs getting wider because of the need to get more content, and it&#039;s not really content in most cases but ads.

I guess keeping the ads clean to not interfere too much with the content isn&#039;t on chows agenda anymore, right now it looks more like a christmas tree than a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that they become bigger because of the need to cram more content, on john chows blog now all I see is a lot of ads, which takes away the focus of the content which is the main thing regarding the blog, the content/posts is the whole point of a blog, wider solutions are for regular sites.<br />
I feel that it&#8217;s more blog heading towards regular site layout than blogs getting wider because of the need to get more content, and it&#8217;s not really content in most cases but ads.</p>
<p>I guess keeping the ads clean to not interfere too much with the content isn&#8217;t on chows agenda anymore, right now it looks more like a christmas tree than a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
