<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What If Google Took Over the Media?</title> <atom:link href="http://natewhitehill.com/what-if-google-took-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://natewhitehill.com/what-if-google-took-over/</link> <description>Internet Business and Marketing</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:50:10 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <item><title>By: Nate Whitehill</title><link>http://natewhitehill.com/what-if-google-took-over/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link> <dc:creator>Nate Whitehill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 06:40:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/2007/01/27/what-if-google-took-over/#comment-37</guid> <description>Google is going to be doing great things over the next few years. And yes...that article from Vinay really shows you how much more powerful Google will become. Thanks for the comment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is going to be doing great things over the next few years. And yes&#8230;that article from Vinay really shows you how much more powerful Google will become. Thanks for the comment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AnthonyC</title><link>http://natewhitehill.com/what-if-google-took-over/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link> <dc:creator>AnthonyC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:35:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/2007/01/27/what-if-google-took-over/#comment-35</guid> <description>Wow, that was a pretty intriguing video....extremely thought provoking and well enjoyed!!  Sweet FIND Nate!! This video coupled with that recent article recommendation from Vinay are 2 very powerful pieces of information, regardless of its somewhat fictitious or futuristic state of predictions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that was a pretty intriguing video&#8230;.extremely thought provoking and well enjoyed!!  Sweet FIND Nate!! This video coupled with that recent article recommendation from Vinay are 2 very powerful pieces of information, regardless of its somewhat fictitious or futuristic state of predictions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vinay</title><link>http://natewhitehill.com/what-if-google-took-over/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link> <dc:creator>Vinay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:34:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/2007/01/27/what-if-google-took-over/#comment-24</guid> <description>Nate - Definitely a thought provoking film.
While on the subject, I would highly recommend this article:http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070119_001510.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate &#8211; Definitely a thought provoking film.<br
/> While on the subject, I would highly recommend this article:</p><p><a
href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070119_001510.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070119_001510.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cbb</title><link>http://natewhitehill.com/what-if-google-took-over/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link> <dc:creator>cbb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:17:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/2007/01/27/what-if-google-took-over/#comment-22</guid> <description>I think it&#039;s absolutely brilliant as a prediction!  It would be the ultimate cyberspace guarantee that perception IS reality, and would re-create the same closed-loop system of information already in place (since most of us only choose exposure to media which validates our pre-existing biases anyhow).  I am convinced, however, that there will always be access to diverse points of view, if that&#039;s a value we hold dear.  Whether we&#039;re reading the New York Times, USA Today, or the National Review, it&#039;s still incumbent upon us to be critical thinkers.  In my opinion &quot;Google-zon&quot; won&#039;t be the problem; our disinclination to think outside our own boxes is.  Perhaps in the EPIC template that hypothetically would provide each individual a personalized reality, intelligent and opposing points of view could be simultaneously offered.  To borrow a nineties cliche, &quot;It&#039;s the dialectic, stupid!&quot;  Thanks for exposing us to this fascinating clip!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s absolutely brilliant as a prediction!  It would be the ultimate cyberspace guarantee that perception IS reality, and would re-create the same closed-loop system of information already in place (since most of us only choose exposure to media which validates our pre-existing biases anyhow).  I am convinced, however, that there will always be access to diverse points of view, if that&#8217;s a value we hold dear.  Whether we&#8217;re reading the New York Times, USA Today, or the National Review, it&#8217;s still incumbent upon us to be critical thinkers.  In my opinion &#8220;Google-zon&#8221; won&#8217;t be the problem; our disinclination to think outside our own boxes is.  Perhaps in the EPIC template that hypothetically would provide each individual a personalized reality, intelligent and opposing points of view could be simultaneously offered.  To borrow a nineties cliche, &#8220;It&#8217;s the dialectic, stupid!&#8221;  Thanks for exposing us to this fascinating clip!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://natewhitehill.com/what-if-google-took-over/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:43:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/2007/01/27/what-if-google-took-over/#comment-21</guid> <description>Am amazing if somber look into the future.  Not too farfetched, it seems, but chilling nonetheless.  Well-produced and executed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am amazing if somber look into the future.  Not too farfetched, it seems, but chilling nonetheless.  Well-produced and executed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blancarte</title><link>http://natewhitehill.com/what-if-google-took-over/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link> <dc:creator>Blancarte</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:26:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natewhitehill.com/2007/01/27/what-if-google-took-over/#comment-20</guid> <description>Pure speculation and &quot;googly&quot; eyed fanboyism. Possible, yes. Probable, maybe. Such a complex concept can&#039;t be argued in a short comment so I won&#039;t try. It would be interesting though...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pure speculation and &#8220;googly&#8221; eyed fanboyism. Possible, yes. Probable, maybe. Such a complex concept can&#8217;t be argued in a short comment so I won&#8217;t try. It would be interesting though&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/21 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via NateWhitehill.uniqueblogdesign.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: natewhitehill.com @ 2010-07-29 22:51:46 -->